Oregon Treasury Doesn’t Know, Doesn’t Care It’s Invested In Risky Crypto!

Link: https://pensionwarriorsdwardsiedle.substack.com/p/oregon-treasury-doesnt-know-doesnt

Excerpt:

I note with great emphasis: “We do not possess thorough look through ability.”

That’s the first time I’ve ever heard those confusing words. Here’s a translation:

  1. State pension fiduciaries have failed to demand that external investment managers disclose to the pension on a timely basis all investments, including but not limited to crypto, in their funds’ portfolios.
  2. State pension fiduciaries have failed to disclose to Oregonians information they don’t possess regarding the pension’s riskiest investments.
  3. State pension fiduciaries cannot be monitoring the risks related to crypto investments they do not know they own.

Bad enough that the Oregon State Treasury is gambling $60 billion in high-cost, high-risk alternative funds. State officials don’t know—and apparently don’t even care—what’s in those funds.

Author(s): Edward Siedle

Publication Date: 10 Sept 2025

Publication Site: Pension Warriors, substack

BlackRock calls out state officials for ‘politicization’ of public pensions

Link: https://www.esgdive.com/news/blackrock-responds-to-republican-democrat-state-finance-officials-politicization-public-pensions/759147/

Excerpt:

  • BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, said letters sent to the firm by 26 Republican state finance officials in July and 17 Democrat state finance officials in August “continue a concerning trend by both parties of politicizing the management of public pension funds.” 
  • “Many of our clients value having BlackRock act as an engaged shareholder on their behalf,” S. Jane Moffat, BlackRock’s managing director of U.S. government affairs and public policy, told the finance officials in an Aug. 27 response letter. “At the same time, BlackRock is not an activist investor.”
  • BlackRock’s response comes after the state officials painted drastically different views of what they viewed as “fiduciary duty” in their letters. The coalition of Republican state officials urged the asset manager and other financial institutions to stop framing climate change as a long-term risk, while the coalition of Democrat officials looked to push BlackRock and others to reaffirm their commitment to managing climate change and other similar long-term risks.

Author(s): Lamar Johnson

Publication Date: 3 Sept 2025

Publication Site: ESG Dive

Dutch fund PFZW reduces BlackRock ties over clash on sustainability

Link: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/dutch-fund-pfzw-reduces-blackrock-ties-over-clash-sustainability-2025-09-03/

Excerpt:

Dutch pension fund PFZW has stopped investing in stock funds managed by BlackRock (BLK.N), opens new tab, in part because of concerns over the U.S. firm’s voting record on sustainability issues, its lead asset manager PGGM said on Wednesday.

The move comes amid a wider activist campaign in the Netherlands to push the country’s large pension schemes to drop managers that have reduced support for climate change-linked resolutions at company meetings.

While some companies have scaled back the importance they attach to sustainability since the re-election of U.S. President Donald Trump, many of the biggest Dutch pension funds still consider it the best long-term approach.

….

In June, U.S. asset owner the Sierra Club Foundation said it would move $10.5 million in assets because BlackRock had not pressed portfolio companies enough on climate.

In response to the PFZW move, a BlackRock spokesperson said: “BlackRock clients – including our Dutch clients – continue to invest through BlackRock to meet their sustainable investing goals, entrusting us to manage over $1 trillion in sustainable and transition assets on their behalf.”

Author(s): Bart H. Meijer and Simon Jessop

Publication Date: 3 Sept 2025

Publication Site: Reuters