Modeling the Casualty Exposures in Epidemics

Link: https://ar.casact.org/modeling-the-casualty-exposures-in-epidemics/

Graphic:

Excerpt:

A casualty actuary might be forgiven for thinking that illness and disease are what those “other” actuaries worry about.

Though risk of illness is usually considered the province of the life-health actuary, a session at the 2017 CAS Annual Meeting in Anaheim, California, showed how epidemics can affect property-casualty risks. The session also described how to approach modeling those exposures.

….

Milliman actuary Cody Webb, FCAS, began by demonstrating how big the insurance gap is, particularly in developing nations. He explained that the spectrum of losses ranges from minuscule (loss of a single strand of hair) to catastrophic (sudden, instant death) and can affect a single person or every entity in the universe across eons. But the insurable losses share some traits, Webb said, including:

  • a large number of similar exposures.
  • a definite loss, driven by some sort of accident.
  • the ability to create an affordable premium to reimburse after such a loss.
  • the ability to accurately quantify the amount of loss sustained. This is the most important shared trait.

In showing a chart of property-casualty insurance as a percentage of GDP — with the wealthier countries better insured than others — Webb noted that insurance companies need to “quantify and develop products that meet all criteria of insurability.” (See chart below.)

Author(s): James P. Lynch

Publication Date: 16 Jan 2018

Publication Site: Actuarial Review, Casualty Actuarial Society

A Framework for Defining a Role for Insurers in “Uninsurable” Risks: Insights from COVID-19

Link: https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/JIR-ZA-40-10-EL.pdf

Graphic:

Excerpt:

RETHINKING UNINSURABILITY While many have viewed insurability as a binary choice with respect to a risk (i.e., insurable or uninsurable), insurability is more appropriately considered on a continuum, ranging from easy-to-insure, such as automobile or life insurance, to difficult-to-insure, such as pandemic, loss of the electrical grid, and other extreme catastrophic risks.

FRAMEWORK The role of private and public sectors in dealing with risks that are difficult-to-insure should be to develop strategies that enable a greater degree of insurability. To do so, the framework suggests that policymakers consider three fundamental options in dealing with the insurance industry:

Status Quo (SQ) –This option (SQ) contemplates a similar dynamic to that experienced with COVID-19, wherein businesses, nonprofits, and local governments found limited (if any) insurance coverage for their losses and ex post relief programs funded by the government.

Service Provider (SP) – This option (SP) contemplates an administrative, non-risk-bearing role for the insurance industry while the entire cost of claims would be publicly financed.

Service and Risk (SR) –In addition to its role as a service provider as characterized by SP, this option (SR) would expect insurers to commit capital – in an amount that does not threaten their financial viability – to cover a specified layer or other defined element of losses.

Author(s): Howard Kunreuther, Jason Schupp

Publication Date: 2021

Publication Site: NAIC