Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in community-dwelling populations with emphasis on the elderly: An overview

Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.08.21260210v2

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.08.21260210

Graphic:

Excerpt:

Objective: This mixed design synthesis aimed to estimate the infection fatality rate (IFR) of
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in community-dwelling elderly populations and other age
groups from seroprevalence studies. Protocol: https://osf.io/47cgb.


Methods and analyses: Eligible were seroprevalence studies done in 2020 and identified by any of
four existing systematic reviews; with ≥1000 participants aged ≥70 years that presented
seroprevalence in elderly people; that aimed to generate samples reflecting the general population;
and whose location had available data on cumulative COVID-19 deaths in elderly (primary cutoff
≥70 years; ≥65 or ≥60 also eligible). We extracted the most fully adjusted (if unavailable,
unadjusted) seroprevalence estimates. We also extracted age- and residence-stratified cumulative
COVID-19 deaths (until 1 week after the seroprevalence sampling midpoint) from official reports,
and population statistics, to calculate IFRs corrected for unmeasured antibody types. Sample sizeweighted IFRs were estimated for countries with multiple estimates. Secondary analyses examined
data on younger age strata from the same studies.


Results: Twenty-five seroprevalence surveys representing 14 countries were included. Across all
countries, the median IFR in community-dwelling elderly and elderly overall was 2.9% (range 0.2%-
6.9%) and 4.9% (range 0.2%-16.8%) without accounting for seroreversion (2.4% and 4.0%,
respectively, accounting for 5% monthly seroreversion). Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded similar
results. IFR was higher with larger proportions of people >85 years. Younger age strata had low IFR
values (median 0.0013%, 0.0088%, 0.021%, 0.042%, 0.14%, and 0.65%, at 0-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-
49, 50-59, and 60-69 years even without accounting for seroreversion).

Author(s):Cathrine Axfors, John P A Ioannidis

Publication Date: 23 Dec 2021, accessed 17 Jan 2022

Publication Site: medrXiV

Quantifying impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic through life expectancy losses: a population-level study of 29 countries

Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.02.21252772v4

Graphic:

Abstract:

Variations in the age patterns and magnitudes of excess deaths, as well as differences in population sizes and age structures make cross-national comparisons of the cumulative mortality impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic challenging. Life expectancy is a widely-used indicator that provides a clear and cross-nationally comparable picture of the population-level impacts of the pandemic on mortality. Life tables by sex were calculated for 29 countries, including most European countries, Chile and the USA for 2015-2020. Life expectancy at birth and at age 60 for 2020 were contextualised against recent trends between 2015-19. Using decomposition techniques we examined which specific age groups contributed to reductions in life expectancy in 2020 and to what extent reductions were attributable to official COVID-19 deaths. Life expectancy at birth declined from 2019 to 2020 in 27 out of 29 countries. Males in the USA and Bulgaria experienced the largest losses in life expectancy at birth during 2020 (2.1 and 1.6 years respectively), but reductions of more than an entire year were documented in eleven countries for males, and eight among females. Reductions were mostly attributable to increased mortality above age 60 and to official COVID-19 deaths. The COVID-19 pandemic triggered significant mortality increases in 2020 of a magnitude not witnessed since WW-II in Western Europe or the breakup of the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe. Females from 15 countries and males from 10 ended up with lower life expectancy at birth in 2020 than in 2015.

Author(s): José Manuel Aburto, Jonas Schöley, Ilya Kashnitsky, Luyin Zhang, Charles Rahal, Trifon I. Missov Melinda C. Mills, Jennifer B. Dowd, Ridhi Kashyap

Publication Date: 6 April 2021

Publication Site: medRxiv

Patterns of COVID-19 pandemic dynamics following deployment of a broad national immunization program

Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.08.21251325v2.full-text

Graphic:

Abstract:

Studies on the real-life impact of the BNT162b2 vaccine, recently authorized for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are urgently needed. Here, we analysed the temporal dynamics of the number of new COVID-19 cases and hospitalization in Israel following a rapid vaccination campaign initiated on December 20th, 2020. We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of data originating from the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) from March 2020 to February 2021. In order to distill the possible effect of the vaccinations from other factors, including a third lockdown imposed in Israel on January 2021, we compared the time-dependent changes in number of COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations between (1) individuals aged 60 years and older, eligible to receive the vaccine earlier, and younger age groups; (2) the latest lockdown (which was imposed in parallel to the vaccine rollout) versus the previous lockdown, imposed on September 2020; (3) early-vaccinated cities compared to late-vaccinated cities; and (4) early-vaccinated geographical statistical areas (GSAs) compared to late-vaccinated GSAs. In mid-January, the number of COVID-19 cases and hospitalization started to decline, with a larger and earlier decrease among older individuals, followed by younger age groups, by the order in which they were prioritized for vaccination. This fast and early decline in older individuals was more evident in early-vaccinated compared to late-vaccinated cities. Such a pattern was not observed in the previous lockdown. Our analysis demonstrates evidence for the real-life impact of a national vaccination campaign in Israel on the pandemic dynamics. We believe that our findings have major public health implications in the struggle against the COVID-19 pandemic, including the public ’s perception of the need for and benefit of nationwide vaccination campaigns. More studies aimed at assessing the effectiveness and impact of vaccination both on the individual and on the population level, with longer followup, are needed.

Author(s): Hagai Rossman, Smadar Shilo, Tomer Meir, Malka Gorfine, Uri Shalit, Eran Segal

Publication Date: 8 March 2021

Publication Site: MedRXiV

Excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic among Californians 18–65 years of age, by occupational sector and occupation: March through October 2020

Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.21.21250266v1.full.pdf

Graphic:

Excerpt:

Certain occupational sectors have been associated with high excess mortality during the pandemic, particularly among racial and ethnic groups also disproportionately affected by COVID-19. In-person essential work is a likely venue of transmission of coronavirus infection and must be addressed through strict enforcement of health orders in workplace settings and protection of in-person workers. Vaccine distribution prioritizing in-person essential workers will be important for reducing excess COVID mortality.

Author(s): Yea-Hung Chen, Maria Glymour, Alicia Riley, John Balmes, Kate Duchowny, Robert Harrison, Ellicott Matthay, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo

Publication Date: 22 January 2021

Publication Site: MedrXiv